The Cinemorph
Subscribe
Cover photo

It's A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad Remake

For every movie remake that is as good or better than the original, there are three or four hundred that are just plain terrible. Let's wallow!

Dana Gould

Feb 1
1
69

If you enjoy The Cinemorph, please hit the subscribe button. If you don't, please see me during office hours.

Movie remakes. As long as movies are a source of profit, remakes will be unavoidable. This is despite the fact that, of the thousands of remakes out there, there are only a handful of good ones. Movie remakes, like most other modern woes, are nothing new. According to the website Reel Rundown, the first movie remake dates back to 1896. Louis Lumiere, of the famous Lumiere Brothers, released a film entitled Partie d’ecarte’ (“Card Game”) a simple, one minute film depicting a couple dudes playing cards and drinking wine. Later that same year, George Melies remade it as Une Partie De Cartes (“Card Party).”

Was it any better? Not sure. It would take two whole minutes to watch both films and I just don’t have that kind of time. The point is, remakes have been here since the inception of film and they’re not going away. To begin with, studios love remakes. Remakes come brimming with sumptuous, “pre-awareness.” The audience has a built-in sense of familiarity with the title, increasing the odds they’ll give it a chance.

The Rule Of Remakes is that they are, more often than not, pale or misfired rehashes of a superior original that should, in retrospect, never have seen the inside of a projector. There are infrequent occasions when a remake is every bit as good as its original. James Mangold’s 3:10 To Yuma, from 2007, in my opinion, is every bit as suspenseful and action-packed as its predecessor, made fifty years earlier. I find Jeff Bridges’ Rooster Cogburn from the Cohen Bros.’ True Grit a lot funnier and more dimensional than the John Wayne (albeit Oscar winning) original. Phillip Kaufman’s 1978 Invasion Of The Body Snatchers updates the story of 1956 Don Siegel original, changing its focus from Cold War paranoia to late 70’s cultural conformity paranoia, without sacrificing one beat of the suspense or drama. Plus you get Donald Sutherland with an afro, so there’s that.

A remake that far surpasses its original? The Maltese Falcon. I know what you’re saying, “They remade The Maltese Falcon?” Yes, they did. In 1941, with Humphrey Bogart. The original Maltese Falcon was made in 1931 and starred Ricardo Cortez (who?) as Sam Spade. The original Maltese Falcon is a pre-code potboiler that follows the story of Dashell Hammett’s novel, but lacks the flair of John Huston’s remake made ten years on. The film does boast a performance by the always-great Dwight Frye (Renfield in Tod Browning’s Dracula), but that’s about it. The Maltese Falcon is one of those rare instances when a film is mentioned and it’s totally fine to say, “It’s good, but you HAVE to see the remake.”

Kieth David, John Carpenter and Kurt Russell on the set of John Carpenter's masterpiece, The Thing.

Another remake that improves upon its original? John Carpenter’s 1982 version of The Thing. The original, made in ‘56, was produced by Howard Hawks and directed by Christian Nyby. “The Thing” in the The Thing was played by a young James Arness, who would go on to fame and fortune as Marshall Matt Dillon on Gunsmoke. The Arness Thing is portrayed as Space Frankenstein, a hulking brute with a squarish head that crashed its flying saucer into the polar ice caps and was now laying siege to an arctic research station.

Carpenter’s version hews closer to the original story (Who Goes There? by John W. Campbell), in which the alien was a shape-shifting menace that could replicate any creature it came into contact with. Carpenter handed the concept over to special effects artist Rob Bottin who, together with storyboard artist Mike Ploog, helped Carpenter create, in the words of Empire magazine’s Adam Smith, “a peerless masterpiece of relentless suspense, retina-wrecking visual excess and outright nihilistic terror.”

Carpenter’s The Thing is – now – widely regarded as a masterpiece. At the time of its release, not so much. Two weeks prior to The Thing’s premiere, another space alien, E.T. The Extraterrestrial, landed in American theaters. By the time Carpenter’s film hit screens, no one wanted anything to do with anything from outer space that wasn’t warm and cuddly and could make bicycles fly. In fact, critics hated Carpenter’s film, and audiences responded with indifference at best.

Fun fact! Blade Runner was released the same day as The Thing and met with a similarly disinterested audience and lackluster critical reception.

In time, audiences and critics caught up with Carpenter’s vision, and the film now stands as a classic. In fact, in 2011, Universal Studios released The Thing, a prequel to The Thing, which was a remake of The Thing, which was about a monster that could replicate itself.

Go fig.

Next time, Who Thought This Was A Good Idea? Dino DeLaurentiis’ 1976 King Kong.

Fun fact! The Humphrey Bogart Maltese Falcon is a remake.

Subscribe for free to The Cinemorph
By subscribing, you agree to share your email address with Dana Gould to receive their original content, including promotions. Unsubscribe at any time. Meta will also use your information subject to the Bulletin Terms and Policies
1
69

More from The Cinemorph
See all

Wolf In The Fox House, Pt. 3

Richard Zanuck hired Russ Meyer to make a movie. Russ Meyer hired Roger Ebert to write it. The movie was a hit and Richard Zanuck got fired.
May 18
4
14

Wolf In The Fox House, Pt. 2

Russ Meyer started out as a World War II combat photographer and ended up making "nudie movies." The man liked what he liked.
May 13
5
4

Wolf In The Fox House

When Richard Zanuck hired Russ Meyer to make a sequel to Valley Of The Dolls.
May 11
10
5
Comments
Log in with Facebook to comment

69 Comments

  • Joe Haggerty
    Writes Pucks with Haggs
    My mom's favorite movie...love it
    • 10w
  • Chris Berry
    Who could forget Leonard Nimoy in the remake of Invasion of the Body Snatchers. Dr. Kibner was a different role for Nimoy, playing the antagonist. The best part of it? Hearing the hearts of every Star Trek fan collapse in on itself like a black hole. …
    See more
    • 15w
    • Author
      Dana Gould
      And that creepy Goddamn sauna!
      3
      • 15w
  • Mike Ensing
    The most “remade” character in film has to be Sherlock Holmes - pretty sure a record number of actors have portrayed him, from silent films thru Rathbone up to Downey, Jr. and Cumberbatch. I would even argue that the Batman characters have many similar…
    See more
    • 15w
    • Edited
    • Author
      Dana Gould
      True! I'm surprised that the Cumberpatch series isn's bigger. It was SO GOOD.
      2
      • 15w
  • Maggie Ragaisis
    I still am amazed that i never realized Paul Frees was in the original THE THING FROM ANOTHER WORLD, until I had it on while kind of dozing on the couch with my eyes closed just listening and was like, ”That’s the guy from the Stan Freberg albums!”
    De…
    See more
    • 15w
    • Author
      Dana Gould
      He was everywhere!
      • 14w
  • John Smith
    Let's not forget the weird remake of It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World. It was truly odd. With Cuba Gooding in the lead.
    • 15w
    • Author
      Dana Gould
      Rat Race?
      2
      • 15w
    View 3 more replies
  • Jeffrey McDonald
    Fun fact: The Bogart Maltese Falcon was the second remake. After the 1931 version, there was also "Satan Met a Lady" from 1936. (The Bogart one is superior to both.) I love Vincent Price, but I'd put Cronenberg's "The Fly" in the "better than the or…
    See more
    • 15w
    • Author
      Dana Gould
      Correct on both counts. And shame on me for missing Satan Was A Lady.
      • 15w
  • Thad Ferguson
    I really wish that more filmmakers would take a shot at remaking movies that had interesting ideas but were just poorly executed. Of course I’m sure you have a better chance at success remaking a hit instead of a flop, so I get why it doesn’t really ha…
    See more
    • 15w
    View 4 previous replies
    • Author
      Dana Gould
      Isn't Peter Sarazin in Gumball?
      • 14w
    View 3 more replies
  • Micah Brooks
    One great thing about the '78 Body Snatchers is that it rewards you with multiple viewings, like spotting the infamous scream in the background before we know what that is, the garbage trucks roaming the streets, and the creepy guy staring at Brooke Ad…
    See more
    • 15w
    • Edited
    • Author
      Dana Gould
      Yes! That movie os great. What's with Duvall on the swing set?
      • 14w
    View 1 more reply
  • Sam Klein
    7-year-old me sure thought Kong '76 was the best idea ever. I adored it. Haven't seen it in a while, but with Jeff Bridges, Charles Grodin, Jessica Lange and a giant gorilla, it can't be all bad, right? Right???
    • 15w
    View 1 more reply
    • Author
      Dana Gould
      I agree with Rob, but the stickler is, the opticals. I get stuck on, outside of King Kong, King Kong is pretty great. 😉
      2
      • 15w
    View 2 more replies
  • Rob McFarlane
    I saw Carpenter's The Thing the day it opened in Westwood Village. The theater was practically empty, and I remember thinking, well, I've just seen a masterpiece, but will audiences discover it? In a foreshadowing of things to come, the critic for LA T…
    See more
    • 15w
    • Author
      Dana Gould
      Yes! The Thing;s reviews are so brutal because everyone was in love with ET. And yet, The Thing remains timeless while ET dopes seem critically dated.
      • 15w
View 13 more comments
Share quoteSelect how you’d like to share below
Share on Facebook
Share to Twitter
Send in Whatsapp
Share on Linkedin
Privacy  ·  Terms  ·  Cookies  ·  © Meta 2022
Discover fresh voices. Tune into new conversations. Browse all publications